Tiny Dick Fatty!!

Anonymous said: would you ever fuck a petite young girl with pale skin and dark hair?

ummm, hell ya!  sounds hot!

Anonymous said: Do you think a million followers could ever make that baby dick grow up? (Rhetorical question)

well, ur talking rather tough for an anonymous coward sending this to a “baby dicked” guy!  

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.
High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.
But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

thanks prokopetz, whoever came up with that butcher thing deserves to be forced to walk in stilleto heels for the rest of their life!

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.

High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.

But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

thanks prokopetz, whoever came up with that butcher thing deserves to be forced to walk in stilleto heels for the rest of their life!

(via theonqrayjoy)

my dicklet in a sombrero!

Anonymous said: Holy crap that was a mix of half-asleep typing and autocorrect! That was meant to say kinkiest! Ugh, technology...

ooohhh, ok, kinkiest thing I’ve ever done?  well, I streaked late at night a couple times in the street, under a street light! lol  fondled a bbw in a theater then ate her out at a park.  

Anonymous said: What's the junkie at thing you've ever done?

could you clarify what that means? lol 

Anonymous said: You're kinda my perfect guy... A beautiful fat gut and a cute little dicklet... Shame you live so far away!

I know, all that girls who want a baby dicked fatty are far away! shame we can’t admire each others chubby goodness! lol

Anonymous said: I just came whilst thinking about your gorgeous little dicklet... My bedsheets are a mess now! You ever had a chubby girl that squirts?

nope but had a great date with a big girl in a theatre and a park!  she was dirty dirty dirty! LOVE chubby girls though! wish I could see!

Anonymous said: I can't stop thinking about sucking that sweet little dicklet... You're getting me so wet.

mmmmm, I’d love to eat ur pussy for ya!  

Anonymous said: I noticed you said you're submissive when you've got a man fucking you... What about a woman?

I’m  more of an equal person and stray a little to both sides from time to time!  In other words, I usually go vanilla but like a little sph and sometimes a little enf! lol